måndag 22 september 2014

Reflection of Theme 2


The second week’s theme was Critical media studies. I read Walter Benjamin’s The Work of Art in the Age of Technical Reproductivity and two chapters in Adorno and Horkheimer’s Dialectic of Enlightenment, the chapters were The Concept of Enlightenment and The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception. I thought these texts about critical theory was a bit challenging. As I mentioned last week I did appreciate the lecture and seminar because it clarified parts of the texts and gave me different perspective and understanding of the theme. The lecture basically explained the main ideas in a philosophical context and put them in a historical view, the lecturer also talked about the authors lives. The main ideas and terms where explained and giving in a context or explained by examples which helped me to understand the texts better. So I did learn a lot from the lecture and I thought the model in the end of the lecture was interesting. It showed how myth, enlightenment, observable regularity, rationalism/empiricism, realism/nominalism, deduction/induction were related to each other. After the lecture I read the texts again and I did understand them better. For me, the historically view and the fact that we got to know the authors and their life during the lecture somehow made me read the text with a different view after the lecture, which was interesting. The texts then became easier to understand.


During the first part of the seminar we discussed the theme and had an opportunity to ask questions that we still had, which I thought clarified some question mark and thoughts that had risen during the week. The second part of the seminar were we divided into smaller groups where we discussed some giving questions. Later the whole seminar group discussed what each group came up with. I will bring along from the seminar group our discussion on realism and nominalism and Kant’s cave. Kant’s cave shows how the world of ideas are linked with the world of reasons. I learned a lot this week, as I mentioned in my reflection above. I also think it is fun and a learning process itself too read and understand the texts from a philosophical view. I feel like I did improve my way of thinking in a philosophical context from last week.

4 kommentarer:

  1. Hi Jenny!

    I also liked the model that Håkan showed us in the end of the lecture. I think it was unlucky that we needed to quit the lecture 15 minutes earlier though, because it felt like we had to rush through the model. I would have needed some more time to grasp the model fully and to be able to use it in my reflection of the texts. I'm glad you seemed to understand it and that you could use it though!

    SvaraRadera
  2. Hi Jenny,
    I feel just like you, the text are sometimes very hard to grasp and therefore the seminars are so important because it clarifies a lot for me. I think it’s great that you reread the text as well. We also talked a lot about placing the texts we read in a historical context, which I think is really interesting and important.

    Glad you feel like you improved your philosophical way of thinking, I’m still struggling with that!

    Sofia

    SvaraRadera
  3. Hi Jenny,
    I also liked his model that showed the relation between all the different philosophies and theories. But in the same time I got a little bit confused because of the easiness of the model. I don’t think it always that easy to differ the different point of views. How did the model help you to understand the texts better? :) I totally agree with you that the importance of knowing about the author’s life and within the context he was writing the text. It actually improved my understanding of the concepts and the author’s thoughts.

    SvaraRadera
  4. I think that it is interesting that you mention that a text can be interpreted better if it's read in it's true context. Like said on the seminar, a book/text needs to be read in its' right environment, usually where it's written, to be truly understood. I also found the seminar very good and particularly learning the right definitions of nominalism and rationalism through Kants' cave-example which was very informative.

    SvaraRadera