måndag 6 oktober 2014
Reflection of Theme 4
The fourth week theme was Quantitative research. During this week I read the paper Physical activity, stress and self-reported upper respiratory tract infection written by Olle Bälter. I also read The Benefits of Facebook Friends: Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites written by Nicole B. Ellison, which was my chosen media technology research paper. I thought this weeks theme was fun and the texts were interesting to read. I found this week papers easier to understand than previous ones. But it was still challenging since I was not only focusing on the text itself but also of being critical to the use of method which was used for the study. The seminar was different from previous ones, we spent most of the time focusing on discussing the actually meaning of two terms; quantitative methods and qualitative methods. We were divide into groups and made a competition out of it, which was really fun and appreciated by the students. I thought this learning technique was effective and providing. Mainly because we were not only trying to find as many pro and cons of each term, we were also asked to choose three cons or pros that we thought other groups did not have chosen. This lead too great discussion and great ideas! I did value the seminar because it clarified question marks I had on quantitative methods and qualitative methods. So, the seminar gave me a deeper understanding because we manage to put the terms in a context I have not thought of earlier.
Prenumerera på:
Kommentarer till inlägget (Atom)
Heyhey!
SvaraRaderaI think it is good that we learn how to think critical aswell. At the seminar with Olle we had the task to come up with both advantages and disadvantages with quantitative/qualitative studies. Also in the pre- reflection we did also have to think in a critical path.
I also think the seminar setup was effective and competition really triggers people to become more engaged. So a tribute to Olles seminar setup! Great reflection Jenny and I'm glad the seminar gave you further understanding within the subject!
/Hannah
Hi! Understanding the pros and cons of both methods is fundamental to understanding and knowing when to use each method when conducting a research. Having different points of view is always good to set our own ideas, that’s why I think the way the workshop was conducted was the best way and helped us understand in a better way both methods. For your reflection, I can see that in your case you had a better understanding of the theme after the seminar. Good reflection!
SvaraRaderaIsaac Rondon